Disciplined in Sophisticated Defense and Insurance Litigation

Julius F. “Rick” Parker, III is a Partner at Butler who joined the firm in 2004. Rick’s practice areas include appeals, casual defense litigation, Chinese drywall, premises liability defense, construction, coverage defense, and extra-contractual matters. He has significant appellate and trial experience in both state and federal courts.

Rick earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration in 1987 and owned a successful contracting business prior to attending law school. He graduated cum laude from Florida State University College of Law in 1998, where he served as Articles and Notes Editor for the Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law. During law school, Rick earned book awards in Civil Procedure I, Federal Jurisdiction Remedies, and Energy Law & Policy.

Rick is a former president of the Tallahassee Bar Association's Legal Aid Foundation. He is a member of the Defense Research Institute and continues to publish industry articles. 

Admissions

  • Florida

Education

  • University of Arizona
    Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration
  • Florida State University College of Law
    Doctor of Jurisprudence

Memberships

  • Defense Research Institute (DRI)
  • Tallahassee Bar Association
  • The Florida Bar

Courts

  • Florida Courts (Northern, Middle and Southern Districts)
  • Florida State Courts
  • Florida Supreme Court
  • United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Chase v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., 158 So. 3d 514 (Fla. 2015); Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. Dept. of Financial Services, 125 So. 3d 201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Rundell v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 994 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Delta Health Group, Inc. v. Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 327 Fed. Appx. 860 (11thCir. 2009); Waters v. Miller, 564 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2009); Royal Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Delta Health Group, Inc., 243 Fed. Appx. 551 (11th Cir. 2007); Solomon v. Liberty County Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs, 221 F.2d 1218 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc)

April 27, 2015 PUBLICATIONRicky's Believe It Or Not: Part Two

In the January 26, 2015 edition of this publication, I shared a collection of excerpts from documents authored by attorneys. Given the sheer volume of paper which crosses my desk in reviewing claims for coverage and bad faith, I inevitably come across some very humorous (though not intentionally so) mistakes in the various documents reviewed. This month, I share some of the funniest entries I've seen in deposition transcripts and medical records.

Read More »
January 26, 2015 PUBLICATIONRicky's Believe It Or Not

As an attorney for more than sixteen years, and a practitioner of insurance bad faith for nearly eleven years, I have seen virtually every kind of bad faith set-up one could imagine. I have shared my observations through various articles published in this fine periodical as well as other publications. The law of insurer bad faith is obviously one which is constantly in flux. Therefore, it would be a simple matter to wax eloquent upon the latest pronouncement from the high court of one of our many state and federal courts. However, I feel compelled to digress from the usual stately discussion of the intricacies of bad-faith law and share some of the more amusing things I have come across during my review of tens of thousands of documents contained in claim files, medical records and correspondence, done in connection with representing insurers in this field.

Read More »
August 25, 2014 PUBLICATIONWall Of Confusion: GEICO General Insurance Company v. Bottini And Its Ill-Begotten Progeny

On July 20, 2012, a three-judge panel of Florida's Second District Court of Appeal released what, on its face, appeared to be a relatively innocuous opinion in Geico General Insurance Company v. Bottini . The Bottini appeal arose as a result of Geico's appeal of a jury verdict in the amount of $30,872,266 rendered against it in an uninsured/underinsured motorist (‘‘UIM'') case. Consistent with precedent, the trial court entered a judgment against Geico in the amount of the policy's limit of liability, $50,000. Because the huge verdict had the effect of fixing the plaintiff's damages in a subsequent bad faith case, Geico naturally sought review of that verdict. The panel opinion concluded simply, ‘‘Based on the evidence presented, we are satisfied that even if Geico were correct that errors may have affected the jury's computation of damages, in the context of this case and the amount of the judgment, any such errors were harmless.''

Read More »
August 22, 2013 PUBLICATIONCausal Friday: Better To Be Lucky Than Good

Sometimes it is better to be lucky than good, as the insurers in the following cases learned. These cases demonstrate that, even where the facts indicate that the insurer acted in bad faith, it is still possible for the insurer to escape extra-contractual exposure. In the absence of a causal link between the excess judgment and the insurer's actions, bad faith liability cannot exist as a matter of law.

Read More »
November 05, 2012 PUBLICATIONIs A Discriminatory Refusal To Rent An Invasion Of The Right Of Private Occupancy?

As the I.S.O. "Personal and Advertising Injury" coverage form ("Coverage B") has evolved over the years, one thing has remained constant: claims for wrongful eviction are covered. The modern Coverage B form covers certain enumerated "offenses," one being, "The wrongful eviction from, wrongful entry into, or invasion of the right of private occupancy of a room, dwelling or premises that a person occupies, committed by or on behalf of its owner, landlord or lessor

Read More »
July 26, 2012 PUBLICATIONThe Vanishing Right To Federal Jurisdiction In Bad Faith Claims In Florida

On April 25, 2012, the United StatesDistrict Court for the Southern District of Florida issued its opinion in Moultrop v. GEICO General Ins. Co., remanding a bad faith claim to state court pursuant to the one-year ‘‘repose'' provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). The Moultrop decision is one more in a growing line of cases which refuse insurers access to a federal forum based on the repose provision, under the anomalous reasoning that the right to removal expired before the cause of action for bad faith accrued. Unfortunately for the insurers, 28 U.S.C. section 1447(d) precludes appellate review of an order granting a motion to remand.

Read More »
April 01, 2011 PUBLICATIONRaising the Roof: What's Hot In Construction Defect Litigation

Kathy J. Maus is a partner with Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, having joined the firm in 1991. Julius F. "Rick" Parker III is a senior associate with the firm, having joined the firm in 2004. Ms. Maus and Mr. Parker both practice in the firm's Tallahassee office and focus their practices on first and third party extracontractual litigation defense, casualty litigation and first and third-party coverage matters. Ms. Maus serves on DRI's Insurance Law Committee Steering Committee and is a past member of DRI's Board of Directors. She is also vice-chair of DRI's upcoming Bad Faith Seminar in Washington, D.C. in June.

Read More »
July 29, 2010 PUBLICATIONBad Faith - Variations On A Theme

This is one of a series of articles originally published in Mealey's Litigation Report: Insurance Bad Faith, Vol. 24, #6 (July 29, 2010). © 2010  

Read More »
August 27, 2009 PUBLICATIONFairly Debatable?

On August 5, 2009, the South Dakota supreme court joined an exceedingly small minority of courts in the United States that have imposed a duty to conduct a reasonable investigation into first-party claims in order to avoid "bad-faith" liability.2 As they say, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. This decision certainly affirms the truth of that old saw

Read More »
November 25, 2008 PUBLICATIONUnreasonable Consent Judgments; What Next?

The scene is all too familiar: an insured, disenchanted with its insurer's refusal to defend an action the insured believes is within coverage, decides to enter into a "consent judgment" with the plaintiff, in return for which, the plaintiff agrees only to pursue satisfaction of the "judgment" against the insurer. 

Read More »
March 20, 2007 PUBLICATIONCaveat Insuror

On December 21, 2006, the Florida Supreme Court released its opinion in Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.[FN1] In Dadeland, a bare majority of the high Court, led by Justice Lewis, held that an obligee under a performance bond qualifies as an "insured" within the meaning of section 624.155, Florida Statutes (1999). The Court's decision resulted from the following question certified to it by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals:

Read More »
January 01, 2007 PUBLICATIONPushing The Envelope: Exploring The Newest Trends In Bad Faith Exposure In Automobile Cases

In recent years, the term "bad faith" has become a term which may strike terror in the heart of defense attorneys, claims handling professionals and in-house counsel for insurers; and for good reason. An action for bad faith, whether it be "first-party" or "third-party" can and has led to "extra-contractual damages," i.e., damages which are not governed by limits of insurance or other limitations on coverage contained in the insurance contract. Allegations of bad faith attempt to re-write the rules for claims handling in the middle of the game. For this reason, bad faith exposure cannot be actuarially predicted or accurately accounted in the setting of premiums based on the risk presented. It therefore has the potential to cost insurers more than the maximum exposure traditionally presented by a particular risk under a policy with defined limits of coverage. 

Read More »
Key Points
Practice Area CASE TYPE
  • Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Appellate
  • Automobile Negligence
  • Bad Faith
  • BI (Bodily Injury)
  • Bodily Injury - Coverage
  • Boiler and Machinery - Coverage
  • Business Interruption - Coverage
  • Business Owner's - Coverage
  • Civil Remedy Notices
  • Commercial General Liability
  • Complex Liability Litigation
  • Coverage - Advertising Injury
  • Coverage - Bodily Injury
  • Coverage - Boiler and Machinery
  • Coverage - Business Interruption
  • Coverage - Business Owner's
  • Coverage - First Party Automobile
  • Coverage - First Party Property
  • Coverage - Homeowner's
  • Coverage - Inland Marine
  • Coverage - Personal Injury
  • Coverage - Property
  • Employment Law
  • Excess Coverage
  • Extracontractual Claims
  • Homeowner's - Coverage
  • Inland Marine - Coverage
  • Premises Liability
  • Uninsured Motorist