Disciplined in Sophisticated Defense and Insurance Litigation

June 14, 2019 | Blog Post| Lights. Camera. Not an Action? Amendment to Section 558.004, Florida Statutes

On July 1, 2019, Chapter 558, Florida Statutes, will be amended to add section 558.004(1)(d), which states:  “A notice of claim served pursuant to this chapter shall not toll any statute of repose period under chapter 95.”[1]  In adding 558.004(1)(d), it appears that the Florida Legislature is attempting to correct last year’s ruling from the Fourth District Court of Appeals in Gindel v. Centex.[2]

Gindel held that a claimant’s service of a notice of claim alleging a construction defect under Chapter 558, Florida Statutes, constitutes commencement of “an action” for the purpose of satisfying Florida’s ten year statute of repose under Florida Statute 95.11(3)(c).[3].  Accordingly, as was the case in Gindel, if a claimant serves a statutory notice of claim prior to the expiration of the statute of repose, a subsequent lawsuit filed by the claimant is not time-barred, even if the lawsuit is filed after the expiration of the statute of repose period.[4]  This would appear to render any tolling argument moot.  However, continuing to follow Gindel would conversely appear to render the added language in 558.004(1)(d) meaningless, as service of a notice of claim in and of itself would constitute an action, eliminating any necessity for tolling. 

While 558.004(1)(d) does not specifically state that a notice of claim of a construction defect does not constitute an action under Chapter 95, providing that a notice of claim does not toll the statute of repose period appears to effectively accomplish the same end.  It should be interesting to see how this issue is addressed by Florida courts going forward. 


[2] Gindel v. Centex Homes, 267 So.2d 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018).

[3] Id. at 407.

[4] See Id (Reversing final judgment against homeowners where homeowners provided Chapter 558 pre-suit notice to defendant within ten year statute of repose period.)


A profile photo of William Linero Jr.William Linero Jr. | PARTNER

Construction Defect Litigation

(813) 281-1900 | TAMPA

July 28, 2020 Blog Post"Common Sense" Conquers "Creative Pleading," as the Eleventh Circuit Applies Narrow Exception to Florida's "Four-Corners" Rule to Prevent Plaintiff from "Pleading into Coverage"

On July 23, 2020, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, applying Florida law, looked beyond an operative complaint to relieve an insurer of its duty to defend in BBG Design Build, LLC v. Southern Owners Insurance Company...

Read More »
October 31, 2018 Blog PostTiming is Everything: Defending Subcontractors Against Breach of Construction Contract Claims

Transfer of risk and liability are common occurrences in the field of construction. National builders often employ a single licensed general contractor to oversee the totality of its construction projects throughout the state of Florida.

Read More »
August 21, 2017 Blog PostClaim Barred by Florida's Construction Defect Statute of Repose? Maybe Not. Florida Court Says You Should Read The Construction Contract More Closely

Claim professionals are often reminded that even the most meritorious claim is worthless if not filed within the applicable statute of limitations or statute of repose. In the world of construction defect claims, Florida law provides for a 10-year statute of repose. Under § 95.11(3)(c), the action must commence within 10 years after the date of actual possession by the owner, the date of the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the date of abandonment of construction if not completed, or the date of completion or termination of the contract between the professional engineer, registered architect, or licensed contractor and his or her employer, whichever date is latest. 

Read More »

Key Points

Author Practice Area